- Paige Ross
- 0 min read
HarperCollins vs. IngramSpark
Table of Contents
When choosing the right publishing partner, understanding the key differences between traditional and self-publishing platforms is essential. In this article, we’ll compare HarperCollins Publishers, a globally renowned traditional publisher with over 200 years of experience, and IngramSpark, a self-publishing platform known for its print-on-demand services and extensive distribution network.
HarperCollins is celebrated for its full-service support, marketing prowess, and prestige, but its selective process and longer timelines may not suit all authors. On the other hand, IngramSpark offers flexibility, faster turnarounds, and greater control, though it requires authors to manage editing, design, and marketing independently.
We’ll evaluate these two companies across several critical aspects—services offered, pricing, royalties, publishing speed, marketing, distribution, and customer experience—helping you determine which option best aligns with your publishing goals and needs. Whether you’re a seasoned author or new to publishing, this guide will provide valuable insights.
Quick Comparison
- Publishing Model: HarperCollins operates as a traditional publisher with a highly selective acceptance process, while IngramSpark is a self-publishing platform open to all authors.
- Services Offered: HarperCollins provides comprehensive services, including editing, design, marketing, and global distribution, whereas IngramSpark focuses on print-on-demand and distribution, leaving production tasks like editing and design to the author.
- Timeline and Control: HarperCollins’ process is lengthy, taking 18 months or more with limited author control, while IngramSpark enables faster publishing timelines and grants authors full control over their projects.
| FEATURE |  |  |
| ⭐ Customer Experience | 2.2-star rating (Trustpilot) | 3.0-star rating (Trustpilot) |
| 💸 Affordability | Traditional model absorbs some costs but lower royalties | Low upfront fees ($25-$49) but printing and distribution costs impact author royalties |
| 💰Royalties | Rates are typically lower than self-publishing | Authors retain more revenue after printing and distribution costs |
| ⏳Production Speed | Typically 18 months or more | Can be published in weeks |
| 🏢 Marketing Services | Media coverage, promotional events, and professional publicity teams | Authors handle marketing independently; tools for sales tracking are available |
| 🌎 Distribution | Global reach through major retailers, bookstores, and libraries | Access to over 40,000 retailers, libraries, digital platforms worldwide |
| 🧑💻 Support | Dedicated editorial, design, and marketing teams | Limited; educational resources are provided for beginners |
| 📚Formats | Print and digital formats (eBooks and audiobooks) | Print-on-demand for hardcovers, paperbacks, and eBooks |
| 💎 Transparency | Terms vary by author and are negotiated case-by-case, with limited publicly available details | Clear upfront costs and tools like price calculators to estimate expenses and royalties |
Overview of HarperCollins
HarperCollins Publishers, established over 200 years ago, is one of the most prestigious names in the publishing industry. As the second-largest consumer book publisher globally, HarperCollins produces approximately 10,000 new titles annually and boasts a diverse catalog of over 200,000 print and digital works across 16 languages. Known for its rich history and global influence, HarperCollins represents some of the most celebrated authors and literary works in the world.
HarperCollins excels at providing a full-service traditional publishing experience. Authors benefit from expert editorial development, professional design, extensive marketing campaigns, and worldwide distribution networks that span major retailers, independent bookstores, and libraries. The company’s commitment to quality and reach makes it a preferred choice for established authors, literary agents, and new voices with strong market potential.
However, HarperCollins primarily caters to authors represented by literary agents, making it highly selective and challenging for newcomers to secure a contract. Additionally, as a traditional publisher, authors often have limited control over aspects like cover design, pricing, and marketing strategy. The lengthy publishing timeline—often 18 months or more—may also deter those seeking faster results.
Despite its limitations, HarperCollins remains a powerhouse in traditional publishing, offering unparalleled resources and credibility to authors who meet its rigorous standards.
Key Features
HarperCollins Publishers offers a comprehensive range of traditional publishing services tailored to support authors at every stage of the publishing process. From manuscript development to global distribution, the company provides a robust infrastructure to ensure books reach a wide and diverse audience.
Key Features of HarperCollins Include:
- Editorial Development
- Design and Production
- Marketing and Publicity
- Global Distribution
- Diverse Publishing Catalog
- Prestigious Reputation
- Innovative Print-on-Demand
- Digital Publishing Expertise
- Literary Agent Support
Does Not Offer:
- Self-Publishing Options
- Author Control
- Accessible Entry
- Guaranteed Royalties
Overview of IngramSpark
IngramSpark is a leading self-publishing platform catering to independent authors, small publishers, and businesses seeking professional-quality book publishing without the overhead costs of traditional publishing. Known for its robust print-on-demand (POD) services and extensive global distribution network, IngramSpark empowers authors to publish and distribute their books to over 40,000 retailers, libraries, and online platforms worldwide, including Amazon, Apple, Kobo, and Barnes & Noble.
The platform excels in providing flexibility and control to authors, allowing them to create hardcovers, paperbacks, and eBooks in various formats and colors. IngramSpark also offers valuable tools and resources, such as pricing calculators, sales reporting, and educational content, making it a powerful choice for authors who prefer a hands-on approach to publishing. Its POD model minimizes upfront costs by eliminating the need for bulk inventory, making it a cost-effective option for many self-publishers.
However, IngramSpark has its limitations. It does not provide core publishing services such as editing, proofreading, cover design, or marketing support, leaving authors to manage these essential aspects independently. Additionally, the platform can be challenging for beginners due to its steep learning curve and reported issues with customer support. Despite these drawbacks, IngramSpark remains a strong choice for self-publishers looking for professional quality and global reach.
Key Features
IngramSpark is a versatile self-publishing platform designed to empower independent authors and small publishers with professional tools and global reach. Its services prioritize flexibility, cost-efficiency, and accessibility, making it a popular choice for those seeking control over the publishing process.
Key Features of IngramSpark Include:
- Print-on-Demand (POD)
- Global Distribution
- Flexible Formats
- Price Calculator
- Author Control
- Educational Resources
- Online Sales Reporting
- CoreSource eBook Distribution
- No Inventory Costs
- Accessible Support Network
Does Not Offer:
- Editing and Proofreading
- Design Services
- Marketing Support
- Guided Publishing Support
Affordability
When comparing affordability, HarperCollins and IngramSpark represent two distinct publishing models with significantly different cost structures.
HarperCollins operates as a traditional publisher, where authors typically receive an advance upon signing a contract. The publisher absorbs all production costs, including editing, design, printing, and marketing. While this means authors don’t pay out-of-pocket expenses, royalties are generally lower, as HarperCollins recoups its investment before additional payments are made. For authors who secure a deal, this model eliminates financial risk but comes at the cost of limited control and lower long-term earnings.
IngramSpark, by contrast, is a self-publishing platform with upfront fees for services. Authors pay $49 to publish both print and eBook formats or $25 for eBooks alone, and printing costs are deducted from book sales. While IngramSpark offers higher potential royalties compared to traditional publishing, authors bear the responsibility for production expenses such as editing, design, and marketing, which can add up. The platform’s transparent pricing and print-on-demand model help authors manage costs, but it may not be as affordable for those on a tight budget who need comprehensive services.
In terms of affordability, IngramSpark stands out for authors seeking control and higher royalties with a lower initial investment. However, HarperCollins’ all-inclusive model is ideal for those who secure a deal and prefer not to manage production costs themselves.
Publishing Timelines
The publishing timelines of HarperCollins and IngramSpark reflect their differing approaches to the publishing process, with HarperCollins following a traditional model and IngramSpark catering to self-published authors.
HarperCollins is known for its thorough but lengthy publishing timeline, which typically spans 18 months or longer from manuscript submission to book release. This timeline includes multiple stages, such as manuscript review, editing, design, production, and comprehensive marketing campaigns. While this process ensures a polished final product with professional oversight, it may not suit authors seeking a faster route to publication. Factors like internal scheduling, labor disputes, or high submission volumes can also contribute to potential delays.
IngramSpark, on the other hand, offers a much faster publishing process tailored to self-publishing authors. Authors can upload their manuscripts, finalize formatting, and release their books in a matter of weeks once all files are ready. Print-on-demand technology further accelerates availability, allowing authors to bypass the lengthy production stages typical of traditional publishing. However, this speed depends on the author’s preparedness and ability to manage essential tasks like editing and design independently.
In comparison, IngramSpark’s timeline is significantly shorter, making it ideal for authors who prioritize quick turnarounds. HarperCollins’ extended timeline, while slower, allows for a higher level of professional involvement and market preparation, making it a better fit for authors seeking a polished, high-profile release.
Royalties
The royalty structures of HarperCollins and IngramSpark highlight the stark differences between traditional and self-publishing models.
HarperCollins offers royalties as part of its traditional publishing model, typically paying authors an advance upon signing a contract. Once the advance is recouped through book sales, authors receive royalties, which vary by contract and book format. For print books, royalties are generally around 8-15% of the retail price, while eBook royalties tend to be slightly higher, ranging from 20-25%. Payments are usually made biannually, and the process is managed entirely by the publisher. While this model eliminates upfront costs for the author, the royalty rates are relatively low, reflecting HarperCollins’ significant investment in production, marketing, and distribution.
IngramSpark, on the other hand, allows authors to retain a much higher percentage of royalties. After deducting printing costs and a wholesale discount (commonly 55%), authors keep the remainder of their book’s retail price. For example, a $14.99 paperback with a $5.48 print cost and standard discount leaves the author with approximately $3.51 per sale. eBook royalties are generally higher, as there are no print costs involved. Royalties are paid 90 days after the month of sales via direct deposit, offering transparency and control to authors but requiring more effort in managing costs and pricing.
In comparison, HarperCollins offers lower royalties but absorbs all production and distribution costs, making it ideal for authors who secure a deal and prefer professional management. IngramSpark provides higher royalties but requires authors to handle upfront expenses and take on more responsibility, making it a better fit for self-publishers seeking control and higher earnings per sale.
Marketing Services
Marketing is a crucial aspect of publishing, and HarperCollins and IngramSpark take fundamentally different approaches to this essential step.
HarperCollins offers comprehensive marketing and publicity services as part of its traditional publishing model. Authors benefit from a professional marketing team that handles everything from securing media coverage, book reviews, and promotional events to managing advertising campaigns. This support helps authors gain visibility in a crowded market, leveraging HarperCollins’ established relationships with retailers, media outlets, and literary influencers. These services are included in the publishing package and come at no direct cost to the author, as they are covered by the publisher. However, authors have little input into the strategy and may feel a lack of control over how their book is marketed.
IngramSpark, by contrast, offers minimal marketing support. The platform provides tools like online sales reporting to help authors track book performance, but it does not include promotional or targeted marketing services. Marketing responsibilities fall entirely on the author, requiring them to invest additional time and resources into developing and executing their campaigns. While this approach allows for full creative control, it can be a challenge for authors unfamiliar with marketing or lacking a budget for external assistance.
In summary, HarperCollins simplifies the marketing process for authors by handling all aspects professionally, albeit with limited author involvement. IngramSpark offers no direct marketing services, placing the burden on authors to promote their work independently, which can be daunting for those new to publishing or working with limited resources. For authors prioritizing marketing support, HarperCollins is the clear winner, while IngramSpark suits those comfortable managing their own promotional efforts.
Print-On-Demand (POD) & Distribution
Print-on-demand (POD) and distribution are areas where both HarperCollins and IngramSpark offer valuable services, though they differ significantly in scope, execution, and accessibility.
HarperCollins combines traditional distribution with innovative POD technology. Its extensive global distribution network ensures books reach major retailers, independent bookstores, libraries, and digital platforms worldwide. HarperCollins also partners with brick-and-mortar booksellers through programs like the Espresso Book Machine, which enables on-demand printing of trade paperback books. Distribution and POD services are included in the publishing agreement, with no additional costs to authors, as HarperCollins handles these expenses. However, as a traditional publisher, HarperCollins primarily works with established authors and literary agents, making these services inaccessible to independent authors.
IngramSpark excels in POD and distribution, positioning these as its core services. Its POD technology allows authors to print as few or as many copies as needed, eliminating the need for inventory and reducing financial risk. Distribution is a standout feature, with access to over 40,000 retailers, libraries, and online platforms such as Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Apple, and Kobo. These services are included in the upfront publishing fees ($49 for print and eBook or $25 for eBooks only), making them accessible to all users. Authors retain control over pricing, distribution channels, and inventory decisions, offering flexibility unmatched by traditional publishing.
In summary, HarperCollins provides high-quality distribution and POD as part of its all-inclusive model, but these services are limited to traditionally published authors. IngramSpark specializes in POD and distribution, making it an ideal choice for self-publishers who want professional-level access without the constraints of traditional publishing. This focus makes IngramSpark a go-to platform for authors prioritizing distribution and scalability.
Support Services
Support services play a critical role in an author’s publishing journey, and HarperCollins and IngramSpark differ significantly in the type and level of support they offer.
HarperCollins provides a comprehensive support system for its authors, with dedicated teams handling editorial development, design, production, and marketing. Each author typically works with an experienced publishing professional, such as an editor or production manager, who guides them through the publishing process. This hands-on approach ensures that authors receive expert assistance at every stage, from manuscript refinement to post-publication marketing efforts. However, as a traditional publisher, HarperCollins makes most decisions on behalf of the author, which may limit the author’s involvement or control.
IngramSpark, in contrast, offers minimal direct support for authors. While the platform provides tools and resources, such as blogs, webinars, and guides, authors are largely responsible for managing their publishing process. Customer support is available via phone, email, and chat, but user reviews frequently highlight delays and inconsistent responsiveness. Unlike HarperCollins, IngramSpark does not assign production managers or offer tailored guidance, which can make the platform challenging for first-time authors or those unfamiliar with publishing.
In summary, HarperCollins excels in offering professional, full-service support tailored to each author’s needs, making it an ideal choice for authors seeking a hands-off approach. IngramSpark, on the other hand, leaves authors to manage much of the process independently, making it better suited for those comfortable navigating publishing with minimal assistance.
Customer Experiences & Reviews
Customer experiences with HarperCollins and IngramSpark vary notably, reflecting their distinct business models and service offerings.
HarperCollins is a renowned traditional publisher with a longstanding reputation in the industry. There are too few reviews made on Trustpilot to make an adequate assessment of the validity of their 2.1 out of 5 stars rating. While specific customer ratings on various platforms are not readily available, some customer feedback highlights concerns regarding quality control, customer service responsiveness, and occasional production errors. These issues have affected both readers and authors, indicating areas where HarperCollins could improve to maintain its esteemed status.
IngramSpark, a self-publishing platform, has received mixed reviews from its users. According to a review published five months ago, IngramSpark holds a Trustpilot rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, which is relatively low compared to similar service providers. Positive feedback often mentions the platform’s extensive distribution network and the quality of print-on-demand services. However, common complaints include difficulties with platform navigation, limited customer support, and unexpected costs for revisions and printing.
In summary, while HarperCollins offers the prestige and comprehensive support of a traditional publisher, it faces critiques related to quality and customer service. IngramSpark provides broad distribution opportunities for self-published authors but has received criticism for its user experience and support services. Authors should carefully consider these factors in relation to their individual needs and expectations when choosing between the two.
HarperCollins vs. IngramSpark
Choosing between HarperCollins and IngramSpark depends on your publishing goals, resources, and level of experience. Both companies excel in different areas and cater to distinct author needs.
For first-time authors, HarperCollins is ideal. It is for those seeking a hands-off, professional experience with comprehensive support for editing, design, and marketing. However, the highly competitive submission process and long timelines may make it less accessible for new or unrepresented authors. HarperCollins is the clear winner for authors seeking marketing support, offering professional marketing campaigns, media coverage, and promotional events as part of its traditional publishing model. If you are looking for fast publishing timelines, HarperCollins’ traditional process isn’t the best choice, taking 18 months or longer. For those looking for a hands-off experience, HarperCollins manages the entire process but provides lower royalty percentages.
IngramSpark, on the other hand, is a great option for first-time authors comfortable managing their own production and marketing tasks, thanks to its affordability and flexibility. IngramSpark does not provide marketing services, leaving authors to handle promotion independently. If you are looking for fast publishing timelines, IngramSpark’s print-on-demand model allows for quick turnarounds, making it better suited for authors prioritizing speed. IngramSpark gives authors full control over their work and offers higher royalties after costs.
In summary, HarperCollins suits authors seeking professional support and wide exposure, while IngramSpark is ideal for self-publishers prioritizing control and affordability.
For a deeper dive into HarperCollins and IngramSpark, check out the in-depth reviews of each of them right here on Top10! For further details, visit their respective websites.